{"id":27006,"title":"Gabriel d'Arboussier, \"Une Dangereuse Mystification: La Théorie de la Négritude\"","dimensions":"28 x 19,3 cm","date_begin":"1949-01-01","material":"","art_status_id":13,"legal_status_id":47,"category_id":59,"platform_id":1,"deleted":false,"asset_count":1,"stream_count":0,"collection":"","cached_tag_list":"Monoculture Negritude","publishing_process_id":1,"annotation":"\u003cp\u003eGabriel d\u0026#39;Arboussier, \u0026quot;Dangerous Mystification: the Theory of Negritude\u0026quot;, in\u0026nbsp;La Nouvelle Critique Revue du Parti Communiste Fran\u0026ccedil;ais, June 1949\u003c/p\u003e\r\n","date_end":null,"reference":"","stream_count_app":23,"permalink":"gabriel-d-arboussier-une-dangereuse-mystification-la-theorie-de-la-negritude","description_ca":"","short_description_ca":"","description_it":"","short_description_it":"","cached_primary_asset_url":"http://s3.amazonaws.com/mhka_ensembles_production/assets/public/000/061/180/medium_500/Image000294.jpg?1598952809","cached_actor_names":"","hide_from_json":false,"prev_platform_id":null,"description_uk":"","short_description_uk":"","description_tr":null,"short_description_tr":null,"mhka_works":false,"category":{"en":"Periodical","nl":"Tijdschrift","fr":"Périodique"},"poster_image":"https://s3.amazonaws.com/mhka_ensembles_production/assets/public/000/061/180/large/Image000294.jpg?1598952809","poster_credits":"scan: (c) M HKA","translations":[{"locale":"en","short_description":"","description":"\u003cp\u003eThe article by Gabriel d\u0026#39;Arboussier, a French-Senegalese politician, is a critical response to the \u003cem\u003eAnthologie de la nouvelle po\u0026eacute;sie n\u0026egrave;gre et malgache de langue fran\u0026ccedil;aise\u003c/em\u003e (1948), edited by Senghor and prefaced by Sartre. It reveals the discrepancy between the understanding of black people\u0026rsquo;s struggle for emancipation by the theorists of \u003cem\u003eN\u0026eacute;gritude \u003c/em\u003eand that of communists. D\u0026#39;Arboussier aims his criticism both at Sartre\u0026rsquo;s existentialism and at Senghor\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;mysticism\u0026rdquo;, arguing that the \u0026ldquo;myth of Black Orpheus detaches negro poetry from social reality\u0026rdquo; and would \u0026ldquo;lead to instil in people of colour, by an odious demagogic flattery a harmful isolationist feeling\u0026rdquo;. And whilst it is the universality of class struggle, the fight against imperialism and building of socialist society, which is considered to be the most important, \u003cem\u003eN\u0026eacute;gritude \u003c/em\u003eis denounced as a reactionary movement for its \u0026ldquo;particularism\u0026rdquo;. The arguments of d\u0026#39;Arbousier created the basis of all the following criticism of the movement.\u003c/p\u003e\r\n"},{"locale":"nl","short_description":"","description":"\u003cp\u003eHet artikel van Gabriel d\u0026#39;Arboussier, een Frans-Senegalese politicus, is een kritische reactie op de\u003cem\u003e Anthologie de la nouvelle po\u0026eacute;sie n\u0026egrave;gre et malgache de langue fran\u0026ccedil;aise\u003c/em\u003e, die in 1948 werd uitgegeven door Senghor, met een voorwoord van Sartre. Het onthult de discrepantie tussen de visie van de theoretici van de n\u0026eacute;gritude en die van de communisten \u0026ndash; wat betreft de strijd van de zwarten voor emancipatie. D\u0026#39;Arboussier richt zijn kritiek zowel op Sartre\u0026#39;s existentialisme als op Senghors \u0026#39;mystiek\u0026#39;, en argumenteert dat de \u0026ldquo;mythe van de Orph\u0026eacute;e noire de negerpo\u0026euml;zie losweekt uit de sociale realiteit\u0026rdquo; en \u0026ldquo;leidt tot het inboezemen, via verfoeilijke demagogische vleierij, van een schadelijk gevoel van isolement bij gekleurde mensen.\u0026rdquo; Wat telt voor D\u0026#39;Arboussier is het universele van de klassenstrijd, de strijd tegen het imperialisme en de opbouw van een socialistische maatschappij. N\u0026eacute;gritude doet hij wegens haar \u0026#39;particularisme\u0026#39; af als een reactionaire beweging. D\u0026#39;Arbousiers argumenten vormden de basis voor alle daaropvolgende kritiek op de beweging.\u003c/p\u003e\r\n"},{"locale":"fr","short_description":"","description":""},{"locale":"ru","short_description":"","description":""},{"locale":"de","short_description":"","description":""},{"locale":"es","short_description":"","description":""},{"locale":"el","short_description":"","description":""}],"actors":[]}